Author: The BPI Squirrel

Furthermore! – The Great Wall of Arrogance

Congressman Steve King (R-IA) says the Great Wall of China should be the model for our border with Mexico. But I doubt we would be as successful as that failure. (More) Squirrels aren’t big on construction. We tree squirrels build dreys like Árbol Squirrel and our ground-dwelling cousins dig burrows and tunnels, but we leave major building projects to our more distant relatives, the beavers. If you show me a wall, I see a climbing exercise. Of course you humans aren’t as skilled as squirrels, but you manage. Anytime some of you build a wall, others of you find ways to get over, around, under, or through it. And that’s what I thought of when Rep. Steve King proposed the Great Wall of China as the model for our border with Mexico: Of course I supported the fence and we heard the arguments against the fence, people said, “well you can’t build a 2,000 mile long fence,” as if somehow that would be too much of an engineering marvel. Well we can do the Panama Canal 100 years-plus ago and I’ve been over there to take a look at the Great Wall of China that was built more than 2,000 years ago, and that’s 5,500 miles long and you can march armies down the top of it, the Japanese did that. So building a fence is not that hard;...

Read More

Furthermore! – Windows, Curtains, and Fringes

Political parties need both pragmatists and ideologues, and each needs to let the other do what they do best. (More) We don’t have windows at Árbol Squirrel, but we have curtains for privacy. Mrs. Squirrel made them from fabric remnants that Chef gave her and they’re quite lovely. The twins, Nancy and Michelle, nibbled on Mrs. Squirrel’s new curtains when they were infants. They were too cute for Mrs. Squirrel to get upset, and the fringe they left lets in a nice breeze. We need fringes for the same reason in politics. That’s where most new ideas begin. Many will be bad ideas, like the House Republican Budget’s plan to turn Medicare into a voucher program. Others will be good ideas, like the financial transactions tax in the Congressional Progressive Caucus “Back to Work” Budget. As the Economic Policy Institute report noted, that tax would “raise significant revenue while dampening speculative trading and encouraging more productive investment.” It would also discourage individual investors from day-trading and other mistakes that churn their savings into brokers’ profits. New ideas tend to start on the fringes – right and left – because the fringes don’t have to govern. Think tanks, academics, pundits, and bloggers can kick around ideas without worrying about whether the ideas are politically viable. We did that at BPI when we discussed a Guaranteed Basic Income, an idea from...

Read More

Furthermore! – New Package, Same Nuts

Yesterday the Republican National Committee released their ‘autopsy’ of their defeats in 2012. Their diagnoses are mostly correct, but their prescriptions just put the same nuts in a different package. (More) As a squirrel, I know nuts pretty well. Squirrels know which nuts are the most nutritious, and we’ll go out of our way for them. We use our noses to find nuts we’ve buried, because we can smell nuts even if the nuts are under the ground. So if you put stale airline peanuts in a package that says macadamias, I’ll sniff out the difference. Voters can generally do that too, and that’s the bad news the Republican Party don’t want to face. Yesterday the RNC released a 100-page assessment of their defeats last year and their plans to fix things. They get the diagnosis mostly right: The perception, revealed in polling, that the GOP does not care about people is doing great harm to the Party and its candidates on the federal level, especially in presidential years. It is a major deficiency that must be addressed. One of the contributors to this problem is that while Democrats tend to talk about people, Republicans tend to talk about policy. Our ideas can sound distant and removed from people’s lives. Instead of connecting with voters’ concerns, we too often sound like bookkeepers. We need to do a better job...

Read More

Furthermore! – Lesbian Obesity: A Study in Waste?

I’ve figured out the conservative definition of “government waste.” For them, that means “programs or studies that help people you don’t like.” (More) Take lesbians, for example. A 2007 study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that lesbian women aged 20-44 are twice as likely to be obese as heterosexual or bisexual women in the same age group. That study reviewed data from previous research and concluded there was “an urgent need for weight-reduction interventions that target the high-risk group of sexual-minority women.” However, the authors noted that they “do not provide specific information for the development of culturally appropriate interventions for this population,” because they did not have enough data on specific causes of obesity among lesbian women. Enter the National Institutes of Health, who in 2011 and 2012 approved a total of $1.5 million for a five-year study to explore those causes, according to the conservative Cue outrage about “government” waste, at The Daily Caller, the Washington Times, Political Outcast, and elsewhere in the right-wing media. It’s possible the story isn’t even true, as CNS News provides no links and every other story about this – even the one at MSNNow – traces back to But the study probably is happening … and I’d love to know more about it. Obesity is a serious public health issue, no matter what Sarah Palin...

Read More

Furthermore! – A Victory for Big Glug

There’s very little I care less about than what size soda you buy. This makes me the ideal squirrel to comment on Big Glug’s victory yesterday in New York City. (More) There are many things I care about. Visit me on Twitter and you’ll find me discussing economics and politics with economist Jeffrey Sachs, or pondering the risks of a ‘grand bargain’ with an unscrupulous adversary, or even trying to learn to speak Republican. And that’s when I’m not busy explaining the difficulties of decorating a tree for the Easter Bunny. Between that, researching my thesis on 21st Century Political Nuttitude, and domestic duties at Árbol Squirrel, I stay busy. So I haven’t had much time to follow New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s ban on giant sugary drinks. Well, that and I just don’t care. I know this is a Very Big Deal, pitting The Forces of Science and Health against The Defenders of Freedom. Or something. If you also weren’t following this Very Big Deal, Mayor Bloomberg made a rule that limited sugary drinks to 16 ounces. Sort of. The rule was enacted through the New York City Health Board, not the City Council, so grocery and convenience stores would have been exempt. Dunkin Donuts wouldn’t have been able to sell you a 20-ounce coffee with sugar in it, but the 7-11 next door could sell you...

Read More